Changes for page xwiki-security-review
Last modified by Alex Cotiugă on 2026/05/12 13:08
From version 1.1
edited by Alex Cotiugă
on 2026/05/12 13:08
on 2026/05/12 13:08
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 1.2
edited by Alex Cotiugă
on 2026/05/12 13:08
on 2026/05/12 13:08
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Content
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,412 @@ 1 +{{velocity}} 2 +#set ($discard = $xwiki.ssx.use('PublicWebSite.WebHome')) 3 +{{html clean="false"}} 4 + 5 + ## PAGE HEADER 6 + <section class="hero hero-centered service-hero" aria-labelledby="hero-title"> 7 + <div class="container hero-inner"> 8 + <div class="hero-kicker"> 9 + <i class="fa fa-shield" aria-hidden="true"></i> 10 + XWiki security review 11 + </div> 12 + 13 + <h1 id="hero-title">Security-aware review for XWiki production environments</h1> 14 + 15 + <p class="lead"> 16 + Understand the security posture of your XWiki instance by reviewing versions, extensions, rights, 17 + authentication, configuration and upgrade exposure. 18 + </p> 19 + 20 + <p class="hero-support"> 21 + We help organizations identify practical security risks in their XWiki platform and define a clear path 22 + toward safer operation, maintenance and upgrades. 23 + </p> 24 + 25 + <div class="hero-actions"> 26 + <a class="btn btn-primary" href="$xwiki.getURL('contact.WebHome')">Request a security review</a> 27 + <a class="btn btn-secondary" href="#security-review-process">See the review approach</a> 28 + </div> 29 + </div> 30 + </section> 31 + 32 + ## WHY SECURITY REVIEW MATTERS 33 + <section aria-labelledby="why-security-title"> 34 + <div class="container"> 35 + <h2 id="why-security-title">Why review the security of an XWiki instance?</h2> 36 + 37 + <p class="section-intro"> 38 + XWiki often contains internal documentation, procedures, customer information, project knowledge, 39 + workflows and restricted business data. Security depends not only on the XWiki version, but also on 40 + extensions, authentication, user rights, scripting, configuration and operational practices. 41 + </p> 42 + 43 + <div class="pathways"> 44 + <article class="pathway-card"> 45 + <div class="pathway-icon"> 46 + <i class="fa fa-refresh" aria-hidden="true"></i> 47 + </div> 48 + <h3>Understand upgrade exposure</h3> 49 + <p> 50 + Older XWiki versions can miss important fixes, including security-related fixes that should be reviewed 51 + against your current platform state. 52 + </p> 53 + <ul> 54 + <li>Current version review</li> 55 + <li>Upgrade gap assessment</li> 56 + <li>LTS upgrade recommendations</li> 57 + </ul> 58 + </article> 59 + 60 + <article class="pathway-card"> 61 + <div class="pathway-icon"> 62 + <i class="fa fa-key" aria-hidden="true"></i> 63 + </div> 64 + <h3>Review powerful rights</h3> 65 + <p> 66 + Rights such as admin, programming, script and edit rights can affect the security of the whole platform 67 + when granted too broadly. 68 + </p> 69 + <ul> 70 + <li>Admin and programming rights</li> 71 + <li>Script and edit rights</li> 72 + <li>Space and page permission inheritance</li> 73 + </ul> 74 + </article> 75 + 76 + <article class="pathway-card"> 77 + <div class="pathway-icon"> 78 + <i class="fa fa-lock" aria-hidden="true"></i> 79 + </div> 80 + <h3>Check access boundaries</h3> 81 + <p> 82 + Authentication, group synchronization and permissions should match the real access boundaries expected 83 + by the organization. 84 + </p> 85 + <ul> 86 + <li>Authentication configuration</li> 87 + <li>Group and user model</li> 88 + <li>Restricted content visibility</li> 89 + </ul> 90 + </article> 91 + </div> 92 + </div> 93 + </section> 94 + 95 + ## COMMON REVIEW AREAS 96 + <section class="services" aria-labelledby="review-areas-title"> 97 + <div class="container"> 98 + <h2 id="review-areas-title">Common security review areas</h2> 99 + 100 + <p class="section-intro"> 101 + The review focuses on practical XWiki security risks that can affect real production environments, 102 + especially older instances, customized platforms and installations with complex access control. 103 + </p> 104 + 105 + <div class="services-grid"> 106 + <article class="service"> 107 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 108 + <i class="fa fa-code-fork"></i> 109 + </div> 110 + <div class="service-body"> 111 + <h4>XWiki version and upgrade status</h4> 112 + <p> 113 + Review of the current version, distance from supported releases, upgrade history and recommended update path. 114 + </p> 115 + </div> 116 + </article> 117 + 118 + <article class="service"> 119 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 120 + <i class="fa fa-puzzle-piece"></i> 121 + </div> 122 + <div class="service-body"> 123 + <h4>Installed extensions</h4> 124 + <p> 125 + Review of installed extensions, compatibility concerns, outdated components and potentially sensitive features. 126 + </p> 127 + </div> 128 + </article> 129 + 130 + <article class="service"> 131 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 132 + <i class="fa fa-user-secret"></i> 133 + </div> 134 + <div class="service-body"> 135 + <h4>Powerful user rights</h4> 136 + <p> 137 + Review of admin, programming, script, edit and application-related rights that may increase platform risk. 138 + </p> 139 + </div> 140 + </article> 141 + 142 + <article class="service"> 143 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 144 + <i class="fa fa-sign-in"></i> 145 + </div> 146 + <div class="service-body"> 147 + <h4>Authentication configuration</h4> 148 + <p> 149 + Review of login method, LDAP/AD, SSO, OIDC, SAML, MFA, user creation and group synchronization behavior. 150 + </p> 151 + </div> 152 + </article> 153 + 154 + <article class="service"> 155 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 156 + <i class="fa fa-lock"></i> 157 + </div> 158 + <div class="service-body"> 159 + <h4>Permissions and visibility</h4> 160 + <p> 161 + Review of access rights, inheritance, restricted spaces, public pages, hidden assumptions and permission complexity. 162 + </p> 163 + </div> 164 + </article> 165 + 166 + <article class="service"> 167 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 168 + <i class="fa fa-server"></i> 169 + </div> 170 + <div class="service-body"> 171 + <h4>Configuration and deployment</h4> 172 + <p> 173 + Review of configuration choices, deployment assumptions, reverse proxy setup, attachments, logs and operational risks. 174 + </p> 175 + </div> 176 + </article> 177 + </div> 178 + </div> 179 + </section> 180 + 181 + ## REVIEW APPROACH 182 + <section id="security-review-process" class="split-section" aria-labelledby="process-title"> 183 + <div class="container"> 184 + <div class="split-grid"> 185 + <div class="split-copy"> 186 + <h2 id="process-title">A practical security review approach</h2> 187 + 188 + <p> 189 + The objective is to identify security-relevant risks that are specific to your XWiki setup, not to produce 190 + a generic checklist. A useful review should consider the version, configuration, customizations, extensions, 191 + users, groups and operational context together. 192 + </p> 193 + 194 + <p> 195 + The review is handled carefully and responsibly. The goal is to provide actionable findings and safer 196 + next steps without exposing sensitive vulnerability details unnecessarily or disrupting the production instance. 197 + </p> 198 + </div> 199 + 200 + <ol class="process-list"> 201 + <li> 202 + <strong>Review the current platform state</strong> 203 + XWiki version, extensions, configuration, authentication, deployment model and known customizations. 204 + </li> 205 + <li> 206 + <strong>Assess access and rights</strong> 207 + User groups, powerful rights, permission inheritance, public visibility and restricted content areas. 208 + </li> 209 + <li> 210 + <strong>Identify security-relevant risks</strong> 211 + Version exposure, configuration issues, risky rights, outdated components or operational weaknesses. 212 + </li> 213 + <li> 214 + <strong>Prioritize recommended actions</strong> 215 + Classify findings by practical impact and define realistic remediation steps. 216 + </li> 217 + <li> 218 + <strong>Plan follow-up improvements</strong> 219 + Upgrade path, rights cleanup, authentication changes, extension updates or maintenance recommendations. 220 + </li> 221 + </ol> 222 + </div> 223 + </div> 224 + </section> 225 + 226 + ## WHAT CAN BE INCLUDED 227 + <section aria-labelledby="included-title"> 228 + <div class="container"> 229 + <h2 id="included-title">What can be included</h2> 230 + 231 + <p class="section-intro"> 232 + The scope can be adjusted depending on the sensitivity of the instance, the age of the platform, 233 + the number of users and the complexity of the configuration. 234 + </p> 235 + 236 + <div class="widgets"> 237 + <article class="widget"> 238 + <div class="icon" aria-hidden="true"> 239 + <i class="fa fa-refresh"></i> 240 + <h4>Version<br />review</h4> 241 + </div> 242 + <p> 243 + Review of the current XWiki version, upgrade gap, supported version options and recommended upgrade path. 244 + </p> 245 + </article> 246 + 247 + <article class="widget"> 248 + <div class="icon" aria-hidden="true"> 249 + <i class="fa fa-key"></i> 250 + <h4>Rights<br />review</h4> 251 + </div> 252 + <p> 253 + Review of admin, programming, script, edit and view rights across important spaces and user groups. 254 + </p> 255 + </article> 256 + 257 + <article class="widget"> 258 + <div class="icon" aria-hidden="true"> 259 + <i class="fa fa-sign-in"></i> 260 + <h4>Authentication<br />review</h4> 261 + </div> 262 + <p> 263 + Review of LDAP, Active Directory, SSO, OIDC, SAML, MFA and user synchronization configuration. 264 + </p> 265 + </article> 266 + 267 + <article class="widget"> 268 + <div class="icon" aria-hidden="true"> 269 + <i class="fa fa-file-text-o"></i> 270 + <h4>Findings<br />report</h4> 271 + </div> 272 + <p> 273 + Practical summary of findings, risks, recommended actions and follow-up priorities. 274 + </p> 275 + </article> 276 + </div> 277 + </div> 278 + </section> 279 + 280 + ## IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS 281 + <section class="services" aria-labelledby="considerations-title"> 282 + <div class="container"> 283 + <h2 id="considerations-title">Important considerations</h2> 284 + 285 + <p class="section-intro"> 286 + A security review should be practical, careful and aligned with the way the XWiki instance is actually used. 287 + The purpose is to reduce risk, not to create unnecessary disruption or expose sensitive information. 288 + </p> 289 + 290 + <div class="services-grid"> 291 + <article class="service"> 292 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 293 + <i class="fa fa-eye-slash"></i> 294 + </div> 295 + <div class="service-body"> 296 + <h4>Responsible vulnerability handling</h4> 297 + <p> 298 + Findings are communicated in a way that helps remediation without unnecessarily exposing exploit details. 299 + </p> 300 + </div> 301 + </article> 302 + 303 + <article class="service"> 304 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 305 + <i class="fa fa-balance-scale"></i> 306 + </div> 307 + <div class="service-body"> 308 + <h4>Risk-based prioritization</h4> 309 + <p> 310 + Not all issues have the same impact. Recommendations are prioritized by practical exposure and business context. 311 + </p> 312 + </div> 313 + </article> 314 + 315 + <article class="service"> 316 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 317 + <i class="fa fa-users"></i> 318 + </div> 319 + <div class="service-body"> 320 + <h4>User and group complexity</h4> 321 + <p> 322 + Directory synchronization, group mappings and rights inheritance can create hidden access-control risks. 323 + </p> 324 + </div> 325 + </article> 326 + 327 + <article class="service"> 328 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 329 + <i class="fa fa-code"></i> 330 + </div> 331 + <div class="service-body"> 332 + <h4>Custom code and scripting</h4> 333 + <p> 334 + Custom applications, Velocity scripts, macros and extensions may require review when they affect security-sensitive behavior. 335 + </p> 336 + </div> 337 + </article> 338 + 339 + <article class="service"> 340 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 341 + <i class="fa fa-refresh"></i> 342 + </div> 343 + <div class="service-body"> 344 + <h4>Upgrade as remediation</h4> 345 + <p> 346 + In many cases, the most effective security improvement is a controlled upgrade to a supported XWiki version. 347 + </p> 348 + </div> 349 + </article> 350 + 351 + <article class="service"> 352 + <div class="service-icon" aria-hidden="true"> 353 + <i class="fa fa-check-square-o"></i> 354 + </div> 355 + <div class="service-body"> 356 + <h4>Actionable next steps</h4> 357 + <p> 358 + The review should lead to clear remediation actions, not only a list of theoretical concerns. 359 + </p> 360 + </div> 361 + </article> 362 + </div> 363 + </div> 364 + </section> 365 + 366 + ## RELATED SERVICES 367 + <section class="resource-strip" aria-labelledby="related-title"> 368 + <div class="container"> 369 + <h2 id="related-title">Related XWiki services</h2> 370 + 371 + <p class="section-intro"> 372 + Security review often connects naturally with upgrades, maintenance and access-control improvements. 373 + </p> 374 + 375 + <div class="resource-grid"> 376 + <article class="resource-card"> 377 + <h4>XWiki Upgrade Services</h4> 378 + <p> 379 + Safe LTS upgrades with staging validation, compatibility checks, rollback planning and post-upgrade verification. 380 + </p> 381 + <a href="$xwiki.getURL('services.xwiki-upgrades')">View upgrade services</a> 382 + </article> 383 + 384 + <article class="resource-card"> 385 + <h4>Authentication & Access Control</h4> 386 + <p> 387 + LDAP, Active Directory, SSO, OIDC, SAML, MFA, group synchronization and permissions support. 388 + </p> 389 + <a href="$xwiki.getURL('services.xwiki-authentication-access-control')">View access control services</a> 390 + </article> 391 + </div> 392 + </div> 393 + </section> 394 + 395 + ## CTA 396 + <section class="cta-section" aria-labelledby="cta-title"> 397 + <div class="container"> 398 + <div class="cta-panel"> 399 + <h2 id="cta-title">Need a security review for your XWiki instance?</h2> 400 + 401 + <p> 402 + Send your current XWiki version, hosting model, authentication setup, approximate user/group structure 403 + and any specific security concerns you want to address. A short description is enough to start the review. 404 + </p> 405 + 406 + <a class="btn btn-primary" href="$xwiki.getURL('contact.WebHome')">Request a security review</a> 407 + </div> 408 + </div> 409 + </section> 410 + 411 +{{/html}} 412 +{{/velocity}}